CONTENTS
1.4 Contact Information for the Project
1.5 Summary of Construction Activities
1.6 Summary of EM&A Programme Requirements
2....... Summary of EM&A Results
2.1 Environmental Site Inspection
2.3 Marine Water Quality Monitoring
2.3.2 Action and Limit Levels for Marine Water Quality Monitoring
2.4.2 Action and Limit Levels for Marine Mammal Monitoring
2.5 Marine Mammal Exclusion Zone Monitoring
2.6 Records of Operating Speeds and Marine Travel Routes of Working Vessels
2.7 Implementation Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures
2.8 Summary of Exceedances of the Environmental Quality Performance Limit
2.9 Summary of Environmental Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
3....... Conclusion and recommendations
Annexes
Annex B Construction Programme
Annex C Environmental Mitigation Implementation Schedule (EMIS)
Annex D Status of Statutory Environmental Requirements
Annex F Graphical Presentations of Construction Phase Marine Water Quality Monitoring Results
List of Tables
Table 1.1 Contact Information of Key Personnel
Table 1.2 Contact Information for the Project
Table 1.3 Major Construction Activities Undertaken in the Reporting Period
Table 1.4 Summary of Status for the EM&A Programme under the Updated EM&A Manual
Table 2.1 Key Observations from Site Inspections and Contractor’s Follow-up Actions
Table 2.2 Quantities of Waste Generated for FEP-01/558/2018/A
Table 2.3 Quantities of Waste and Marine Sediment Generated for FEP-02/558/2018/A
Table 2.4 Quantities of Waste and Marine Sediment Generated for FEP-03/558/2018/B
Table 2.5 Location of Marine Water Quality Monitoring Stations
Table 2.6 Action and Limit Levels for Marine Water Quality Monitoring
Table 2.7 Action and Limit Levels for Marine Mammal Monitoring
Table 2.8 Running Quarterly STG and ANI for Finless Porpoise
Table 2.9 Marine Mammal Exclusion Zone Requirements
Table 2.10 Monitoring Results for Marine Mammal Exclusion Zone Monitoring
List of Figures
Figure 1.1 Indicative Location of Key Project Components
Figure 1.2 Location and Works Area of GRS at BPPS
Figure 1.3 Location and Works Area of GRS at LPS
Figure 2.1 Marine Water Quality Monitoring Location
Figure 2.2 Vessel-based Marine Mammal Survey Location
Figure 2.3 Underwater PAM Survey Location
Figure 2.4 Distribution of Finless Porpoise Sightings between October and November 2021
To support the increased use of natural gas in Hong Kong from 2020 onwards, Castle Peak Power Company Limited (CAPCO) and The Hongkong Electric Co., Ltd. (HK Electric) have identified that the development of an offshore liquefied natural gas (LNG) receiving terminal in Hong Kong using Floating Storage and Regasification Unit (FSRU) technology (‘the Project’) presents a viable additional gas supply option that will provide energy security through access to competitive gas supplies from world markets. The Project will involve the construction and operation of an offshore LNG import facility to be located in the southern waters of Hong Kong, a double berth jetty, and subsea pipelines that connect to the gas receiving stations (GRS) at the Black Point Power Station (BPPS) and the Lamma Power Station (LPS). To demarcate the works between different parties, the following Further Environmental Permits (FEPs) were issued for the Project:
§ the double berth jetty at LNG Terminal under the Hong Kong LNG Terminal Limited (HKLTL), joint venture between CAPCO and HK Electric (FEP-01/558/2018/A) – construction commenced on 27 November 2020;
§ the subsea gas pipeline for the BPPS and the associated GRS in the BPPS under CAPCO (FEP-03/558/2018/B) – construction commenced on 23 September 2020; and
§ the subsea gas pipeline for the LPS and the associated GRS in the LPS under HK Electric (FEP-02/558/2018/A) – construction commenced on 13 December 2020.
This is the Quarterly EM&A Summary Report presenting the EM&A works carried out during the period from 1 October to 31 December 2021 for the Project in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual. A summary of monitoring and audit activities conducted in the reporting period is listed below:
|
Activities |
Number of Sessions |
|
For FEP-01/558/2018/A |
|
|
Marine Mammal Monitoring (vessel-based line transect survey) |
12 |
|
Passive Acoustic Monitoring (C-POD deployment) |
Completed for construction phase; data to be retrieved |
|
Marine Mammal Exclusion Zone Monitoring |
During percussive piling works for construction of the Jetty |
|
Environmental Site Inspection |
2 |
|
For FEP-02/558/2018/A |
|
|
Marine Water Quality Monitoring |
6 |
|
Marine Mammal Exclusion Zone Monitoring |
During jetting operation for construction of LPS Pipeline |
|
Environmental Site Inspection |
2 |
|
For FEP-03/558/2018/B |
|
|
Marine Water Quality Monitoring |
27 |
|
Marine Mammal Exclusion Zone Monitoring |
During jetting operation for construction of BPPS Pipeline |
|
Environmental Site Inspection |
9 |
Environmental auditing works, including regular site inspections of construction works conducted by the ET, audit of implementation of Waste Management Plan, and review of the acceptability of operating speeds and marine travel routes of working vessels, including checking of compliance with the approval conditions given by the Director of Environmental Protection for the entry of working vessels within marine parks and the proposed South Lantau Marine Park (SLMP), in pursuant to Condition 3.1 of FEP-01/558/2018/A, Condition 3.4 of FEP-02/558/2018/A and Condition 3.4 of FEP-03/558/2018/B, were conducted in the reporting period, as appropriate. No non-compliance of environmental statutory requirements was identified.
Breaches of Action and Limit Levels
There were no Project-related Action and Limit Level exceedances for marine water quality monitoring in the reporting period.
There were no breaches of Action and Limit Levels for marine mammal monitoring in the reporting period.
Environmental Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecution
There were no environmental complaints, notification of summons and successful prosecutions recorded in the reporting period.
Reporting Changes
There were no reporting changes in the reporting period.
Comments, Recommendations and Conclusions for the Quarter
The recommended environmental mitigation measures for the Project were effectively implemented and the EM&A programme undertaken by the ET has effectively monitored the construction activities as well as ensured proper implementation of mitigation measures in the reporting period.
To support the increased use of natural gas in Hong Kong from 2020 onwards, Castle Peak Power Company Limited (CAPCO) and The Hongkong Electric Co., Ltd. (HK Electric) have identified that the development of an offshore liquefied natural gas (LNG) receiving terminal in Hong Kong using Floating Storage and Regasification Unit (FSRU) technology (‘the Project’) presents a viable additional gas supply option that will provide energy security through access to competitive gas supplies from world markets. The Project will involve the construction and operation of an offshore LNG import facility to be located in the southern waters of Hong Kong, a double berth jetty, and subsea pipelines that connect to the gas receiving stations (GRS) at the Black Point Power Station (BPPS) and the Lamma Power Station (LPS).
The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report for the Project was submitted to the Environmental Protection Department (EPD) of the HKSAR Government in May 2018. The EIA Report (EIAO Register No. AEIAR-218/2018) was approved by EPD and the associated Environmental Permit (EP) (EP-558/2018) was issued in October 2018.
An application for Further Environmental Permits (FEPs) were made on 24 December 2019 to demarcate the works between the different parties. The following FEPs were issued on 17 January 2020 and the EP under EP-558/2018 was surrendered on 5 March 2020.
§ the double berth jetty at LNG Terminal under the Hong Kong LNG Terminal Limited (HKLTL), joint venture between CAPCO and HK Electric (FEP-01/558/2018/A) ([1]) – construction commenced on 27 November 2020;
§ the subsea gas pipeline for the BPPS and the associated GRS in the BPPS under CAPCO (FEP-03/558/2018/B) ([2]) – construction commenced on 23 September 2020; and
§ the subsea gas pipeline for the LPS and the associated GRS in the LPS under HK Electric (FEP-02/558/2018/A) ([3]) – construction commenced on 13 December 2020.
The location of these components is shown in Figures 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3.
This is the Quarterly EM&A Summary Report for the Project which summarises the key findings of the EM&A programme during the reporting period from 1 October to 31 December 2021 for the construction works for the Project in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual and the requirements of the Further Environmental Permits (FEP-01/558/2018/A, FEP-02/558/2018/A & FEP-03/558/2018/B).
The organisation structure of the Project is shown in Annex A. The key personnel and contact details are summarised in Table 1.1 below.
Table 1.1 Contact Information of Key Personnel
|
Party |
Position |
Name |
Telephone |
|
CAPCO / HKLTL (For FEP-01/558/2018/A and FEP-03/558/2018/B)
|
Senior Environmental Manager |
Dr Helen Chiu |
2596 4116 |
|
HK Electric / HKLTL (For FEP-01/558/2018/A and FEP-02/558/2018/A)
|
Head of Mechanical Engineering, Projects Division
|
Norman Chan
|
3143 3819
|
|
Environmental Team (ET) (ERM-Hong Kong, Limited)
|
ET Leader
|
Raymond Chow
|
2271 3281 |
|
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) (Mott MacDonald Hong Kong Limited)
|
IEC |
Lydia Chak |
2585 8473 |
|
Contractor (CNOOC Offshore Oil Engineering Co. Ltd.) |
Environmental Manager |
H Y Tang |
6111 5789
|
|
Environmental Officer |
Kelvin Cheung |
9060 1020 |
|
|
|
|||
The contact information for the Project is provided in Table 1.2. The public can contact the project proponents through the following channel for any enquiries and comments on the environmental monitoring data and related information of the Project.
Table 1.2 Contact Information for the Project
|
Channel |
Contact Information |
|
|
The programme of the construction is shown in Annex B.
As informed by the Contractor, details of the major construction activities undertaken in the reporting period are listed in Table 1.3 below:
Table 1.3 Major Construction Activities Undertaken in the Reporting Period
|
FEP |
Land-based Works |
Marine-based Works |
|
FEP-01/558/2018/A |
§ Nil |
§ Pile installation § Topsides installation |
|
FEP-02/558/2018/A |
§ Nil |
§ Post-trenching § Rock armour placement |
|
FEP-03/558/2018/B |
§ Excavation and backfilling works § Pipe rack – erection and assembly § Building superstructure works |
§ Pipelaying works § Shore-pull operations § Rock armour placement § Post-trenching |
The status of EM&A Programme for all environmental aspects required under the Updated EM&A Manual are presented in Table 1.4. The requirements of relevant environmental monitoring, including monitoring parameters, Action and Limit Levels, Event and Action Plan(s), environmental mitigation measures, etc. are presented in Section 2.
Table 1.4 Summary of Status for the EM&A Programme under the Updated EM&A Manual
|
Aspects |
Relevant FEP(s) |
Status |
|
Water Quality |
||
|
Baseline Monitoring |
FEP-01/558/2018/A FEP-02/558/2018/A FEP-03/558/2018/B |
§ Completed |
|
Efficiency of Silt Curtain System |
FEP-02/558/2018/A FEP-03/558/2018/B |
§ Completed for cage-type silt curtain for dredging operation (under FEP-02/558/2018/A and FEP-03/558/2018/B) § Completed for cage-type silt curtain for jetting operation (under FEP-02/558/2018/A and FEP-03/558/2018/B) § To be implemented upon early stage of construction works for jetting operation for floating silt curtain (under FEP-02/558/2018/A and FEP-03/558/2018/B) |
|
Construction Phase Monitoring |
FEP-02/558/2018/A FEP-03/558/2018/B |
§ On-going for dredging / jetting operations for FEP-02/558/2018/A and FEP-03/558/2018/B |
|
Post-Construction Monitoring |
FEP-02/558/2018/A FEP-03/558/2018/B |
§ To be implemented upon completion of construction works for the Project |
|
Monitoring for Hydrotesting for the Subsea Gas Pipelines |
FEP-02/558/2018/A FEP-03/558/2018/B |
§ To be implemented during hydrotesting for the subsea gas pipelines |
|
First-year of LNG Terminal Operation |
FEP-01/558/2018/A |
§ To be implemented during LNG Terminal operation |
|
Maintenance Dredging |
FEP-01/558/2018/A |
§ To be implemented during maintenance dredging |
|
Waste Management |
||
|
Audit of Waste Management Practice |
FEP-01/558/2018/A FEP-02/558/2018/A FEP-03/558/2018/B |
§ On-going |
|
Ecology |
||
|
Baseline Monitoring (Vessel-based Line Transect Survey and Passive Acoustic Monitoring) |
FEP-01/558/2018/A
|
§ Completed |
|
Construction Phase Monitoring (Vessel-based Line Transect Survey and Passive Acoustic Monitoring) |
FEP-01/558/2018/A |
§ Completed |
|
Post-Construction Monitoring (Vessel-based Line Transect Survey and Passive Acoustic Monitoring) |
FEP-01/558/2018/A |
§ To be implemented upon completion of construction works for the Project |
|
Marine Mammal Exclusion Zone Monitoring |
FEP-01/558/2018/A FEP-02/558/2018/A FEP-03/558/2018/B |
§ Completed for FEP-01/558/2018/A (marine mammal exclusion zone with 500m radius) § On-going for marine dredging / jetting operations for FEP-02/558/2018/A and FEP-03/558/2018/B (marine mammal exclusion zone with 250m radius) |
|
Environmental Site Inspection |
||
|
Regular Site Inspection |
FEP-01/558/2018/A FEP-02/558/2018/A FEP-03/558/2018/B |
§ On-going |
|
Records of Operating Speeds and Marine Travel Routes for Working Vessels |
FEP-01/558/2018/A FEP-02/558/2018/A FEP-03/558/2018/B |
§ On-going |
|
Environmental Log Book |
FEP-01/558/2018/A FEP-02/558/2018/A FEP-03/558/2018/B |
§ On-going
|
The environmental licenses and permits, including further environmental permits, registration as chemical waste producer, construction noise permits, wastewater discharge license, marine dumping permits, etc., which were valid in the reporting period. No non-compliance with environmental statutory requirements, including FEP conditions (status of submission) under the EIA Ordinance was identified. The status of statutory environmental requirements is presented in Annex D.
The potential environmental impacts arising from the major construction activities undertaken in the reporting period provided in Table 1.3 were mainly associated with dust emission from construction activities and stockpiles, waste management, site surface runoff, wastewater discharge, and elevation in suspended solids and disturbance to marine mammals due to marine-based works. There were no Project-related Action and Limit Level exceedances and no non-compliance of environmental statutory requirements identified for the environmental monitoring and auditing works conducted in the reporting period, including regular site inspections of construction works conducted by the ET, audit of implementation of Waste Management Plan, review of the acceptability of operating speeds and marine travel routes of working vessels, and checking of compliance with the approval conditions given by EPD for allowing the entry of working vessels within marine parks and the proposed South Lantau Marine Park (SLMP) in pursuant to Condition 3.1 of FEP-01/558/2018/A, Condition 3.4 of FEP-02/558/2018/A and Condition 3.4 of FEP-03/558/2018/B, as appropriate. The recommended environmental mitigation measures were properly implemented in the reporting period. Excessive variation between the EIA study predictions and the EM&A monitoring results was not found and therefore no investigation and follow-up procedures were considered necessary.
The
environmental mitigation implementation schedule (EMIS) is presented in Annex C.
The EM&A programme for the Project required environmental monitoring for marine water quality and marine mammals as well as environmental site inspections for air quality, construction noise, water quality, waste management, marine ecology, landscape and visual, and hazard to life impacts. As presented in Section 1.6, environmental site inspections and audit on waste management practice, marine water quality monitoring, marine mammal monitoring (i.e. vessel-based line transect survey and passive acoustic monitoring) and marine mammal exclusion zone monitoring were conducted during the reporting period, and the findings are presented below.
Regular environmental site inspections were carried out with the Contractor and Project Proponents to confirm the implementation of appropriate environmental protection and pollution control mitigation measures for air quality, construction noise, water quality, waste management, marine ecology, landscape and visual, and hazard to life impacts under the Project. In the reporting period, 13 environmental site inspections were carried out on 6, 12, 21, 27 October, 4, 10, 18, 24 November, 2, 8, 14, 23 and 30 December 2021. The Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) attended the environmental site inspections as the IEC audits on 6, 21, 27 October, 4, 10, 24 November, 2, 8 and 23 December 2021 during the reporting period. The key observations from site inspections and Contractor’s follow-up actions are summarized in Table 2.1. The environmental mitigation implementation schedule (EMIS) is presented in Annex C.
Table 2.1 Key Observations from Site Inspections and Contractor’s Follow-up Actions
|
Item |
Description |
Contractor’s Follow-up Action(s) Taken |
|
FEP-01/558/2018/A |
||
|
October - December 2021 |
||
|
- |
Nil observation. |
N/A |
|
FEP-02/558/2018/A |
||
|
October - December 2021 |
||
|
- |
Nil observation. |
N/A |
|
FEP-03/558/2018/B |
||
|
October - December 2021 |
||
|
1 |
Dusty material left behind on the paved road with speed bumps at the site entrance/exit was observed. The Contractor was reminded to provide wheel washing at the site entrance/exit, and ensure that vehicles have been washed, including their wheels, to remove dusty material before leaving the site. |
Dusty material was cleared and wheel washing would be provided when necessary. |
|
2 |
The bin for general refuse collection was observed full. The Contractor was reminded to collect and remove the general refuse from site in a timely manner. |
General refuse was disposed of properly. |
|
3 |
Dusty material left behind on the paved roads at the site entrance/exit was observed. The Contractor was reminded to provide wheel washing at the site entrance/exit, and ensure that vehicles have been washed, including their wheels, to remove dusty material before leaving the site. |
Dusty material was cleared and wheel washing would be provided when necessary. |
|
4 |
Surplus of concrete being solidified on bare ground was observed. The Contractor was reminded to ensure that concrete works would be undertaken on the impervious sheet at all times. |
Surplus of concrete was removed. |
|
5 |
Deposited silt and grit inside drainage system at road kerb were observed. The Contractor was reminded to remove the deposited silt and grit regularly. |
Deposited silt and grit were removed. |
|
6 |
Fugitive dust generated from breaking works was observed. The Contractor was reminded to provide dust suppression measures during the course of the breaking works. |
Water spraying was provided to breaking works. |
|
7 |
Chemical containers without provision of drip trays on working vessel (TAPBO 268) were observed. The Contractor was reminded to provide chemical containers with drip trays. |
Chemical containers were removed from the working vessel properly. |
|
8 |
Copies of Further Environmental Permit and Construction Noise Permit were not displayed on working vessel (TAPBO 268). The Contractor was reminded to display the permits. |
Copies of permits were displayed. |
|
9 |
Recycling bins at GRS were full of recyclable materials (i.e. plastic bottles, aluminium cans and scrap paper). The Contractor was reminded to deliver the recyclable materials to appropriate facilities for recycling on a regular basis. |
Recyclable materials were collected properly. |
|
10 |
Stagnant water was accumulated, in presence of temporary blocks (e.g. sand bags) for prevention of surface runoff flowing over the trenches/pits, inside drainage system in the vicinity of excavation works at GRS. The Contractor was reminded that stagnant water should be regularly pumped out in order to maintain proper and efficient operation of the drainage system at all times. |
Stagnant water was drained off properly. |
|
11 |
Discoloured approval label was affixed to an excavator at GRS. The Contractor was reminded to affix proper label to the excavator in accordance with the labelling requirements as per the Air Pollution Control (Non-road Mobile Machinery (NRMM)) (Emission) Regulation. |
Proper label was affixed to the NRMM. |
Waste management audits were performed with reference to the Waste Management Checklists for the corresponding Waste Management Plans detailed in Annex E of the associated Monthly EM&A Reports during the regular environmental site inspections carried out in the reporting period. No non-compliance for Contractor’s waste management practices was identified during the audits.
The quantities of different types of waste and marine sediment generated for the three FEPs are summarised in Tables 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 with reference to the waste flow tables prepared by the Contractor. General refuse was generated under FEP-01/558/2018/A, FEP-02/558/2018/A and FEP-03/558/2018/B, and inert C&D materials (public fill) were also generated under FEP-03/558/2018/B in the reporting period. Detailed waste flow tables can be referred to Annex F of the associated Monthly EM&A Reports for the reporting period.
Table 2.2 Quantities of Waste Generated for FEP-01/558/2018/A
|
Inert C&D Materials Generated (in ‘000kg) |
|||||||||||
|
Month/Year |
Total Quantity Generated |
Hard Rock and Large Broken Concrete |
Reused in the Contract |
Reused in other Projects |
Disposed as Public Fill |
Imported Fill |
|||||
|
Oct 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||||
|
Nov 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||||
|
Dec 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||||
|
C&D Wastes Generated |
|||||||||||
|
Month/Year |
Metals (in ‘000kg3) |
Paper / Cardboard Packaging (in ‘000kg3) |
Plastics (in ‘000kg3) |
Chemical Waste |
Other (e.g. general refuse) (in ‘000kg) |
|
|||||
|
(in ‘000kg3) |
(in ‘000L) |
|
|||||||||
|
Oct 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15.020 |
|
||||
|
Nov 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9.200 |
|
||||
|
Dec 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13.100 |
|
||||
Table 2.3 Quantities of Waste and Marine Sediment Generated for FEP-02/558/2018/A
|
Inert C&D Materials Generated (in ‘000kg) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Month/Year |
Total Quantity Generated |
Hard Rock and Large Broken Concrete |
Reused in the Contract |
Reused in other Projects |
Disposed as Public Fill |
Imported Fill |
||||||||||||
|
Oct 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||||||||||
|
Nov 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||||||||||
|
Dec 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||||||||||
|
C&D Wastes Generated |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Month/Year |
Metals (in ‘000kg3) |
Paper / Cardboard Packaging (in ‘000kg3) |
Plastics (in ‘000kg3) |
Chemical Waste |
Other (e.g. general refuse) (in ‘000kg) |
|
||||||||||||
|
(in ‘000kg3) |
(in ‘000L) |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Oct 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1.670 |
|
|||||||||||
|
Nov 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4.230 |
|
|||||||||||
|
Dec 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|||||||||||
|
Marine Sediment Generated (in ‘000m3) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Month/Year |
Total Quantity of Type L Generated |
Total Quantity of Type M Generated |
Reused in the Contract |
Reused in other Projects |
Open Sea Disposal |
|||||||||||||
|
Oct 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||||||||||||
|
Nov 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||||||||||||
|
Dec 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||||||||||||
Table 2.4 Quantities of Waste and Marine Sediment Generated for FEP-03/558/2018/B
|
Inert C&D Materials Generated (in ‘000kg) |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Month/Year |
Total Quantity Generated |
Hard Rock and Large Broken Concrete |
Reused in the Contract |
Reused in other Projects |
Disposed as Public Fill |
Imported Fill |
|||||||||||||
|
Oct 2021 |
227.730 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
227.730 |
0 |
|||||||||||||
|
Nov 2021 |
638.280 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
638.280 |
0 |
|||||||||||||
|
Dec 2021 |
730.070 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
730.070 |
0 |
|||||||||||||
|
C&D Wastes Generated |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Month/Year |
Metals (in ‘000kg3) |
Paper / Cardboard Packaging (in ‘000kg3) |
Plastics (in ‘000kg3) |
Chemical Waste |
Other (e.g. general refuse) (in ‘000kg) |
|
|||||||||||||
|
(in ‘000kg3) |
(in ‘000L) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Oct 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
67.700 |
|
||||||||||||
|
Nov 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
62.030 |
|
||||||||||||
|
Dec 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
56.210 |
|
||||||||||||
|
Marine Sediment Generated (in ‘000m3) |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Month/Year |
Total Quantity of Type L Generated |
Total Quantity of Type M Generated |
Reused in the Contract |
Reused in other Projects |
Open Sea Disposal |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Oct 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Nov 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Dec 2021 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|||||||||||||
In accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual, marine water quality monitoring shall be undertaken at the monitoring stations as shown in Figure 2.1 and Table 2.5 three times a week at both mid-ebb and mid-flood tides during periods when there are dredging / jetting operations during construction phase of BPPS Pipeline or LPS Pipeline. The interval between two sets of monitoring would not be less than 36 hours. Two replicates of in-situ measurements and samples were collected at each monitored water depth of each monitoring stations. Levels of dissolved oxygen (DO), pH value, salinity, temperature and turbidity were measured in-situ whereas the level of suspended solids (SS) were determined by a HOKLAS accredited laboratory. The detailed methodology is presented in the Updated EM&A Manual.
Table 2.5 Location of Marine Water Quality Monitoring Stations
|
Station |
Easting |
Northing |
Description |
|
Group 1 – During construction at the pipeline shore approach at LPS (KP17.4 - 18.2), West Lamma Channel (KP14.5 - 17.4) |
|||
|
IM1 |
829453 |
806896 |
Impact Station for Coastline of South Lamma |
|
IM2 |
828235 |
810347 |
Impact Station for Coastline of North Lamma |
|
E1 |
827317 |
811510 |
Control Station for Ebb Tide |
|
F1 |
827892 |
804243 |
Control Station for Flood Tide |
|
Group 2 – During construction at the Double Berth Jetty to West Lamma Channel (KP0.0 - 14.5) |
|||
|
IM3 |
820683 |
805931 |
Impact Station for Coastline of South Cheung Chau |
|
IM4 |
816997 |
805153 |
Impact Station for Coastline of South Shek Kwu Chau |
|
IM5 |
814068 |
804100 |
Boundary of Proposed South Lantau Marine Park (MP) |
|
IM6 |
814073 |
802029 |
Boundary of Proposed South Lantau MP |
|
E2 |
813367 |
808213 |
Control Station for Ebb Tide |
|
F2 |
822532 |
802161 |
Control Station for Flood Tide |
|
F3 |
815032 |
801161 |
Control Station for Flood Tide |
|
Group 3 – During construction at the Jetty Approach (KP0.0 - 5.0), South of Soko Islands (KP5.0 - 8.9), Southwest of Soko Islands (KP8.9 - 12.1) |
|||
|
IM6 |
814073 |
802029 |
Boundary of Proposed South Lantau MP |
|
IM7 |
811652 |
802029 |
Boundary of Proposed South Lantau MP |
|
IM8 |
810833 |
801430 |
Boundary of Proposed South Lantau MP |
|
IM9 |
807101 |
801595 |
Boundary of Proposed South Lantau MP |
|
E3 |
802686 |
804123 |
Control Station for Ebb Tide |
|
F3 |
815032 |
801161 |
Control Station for Flood Tide |
|
Group 4 – During construction at the Adamasta Channel (KP12.1 - 15.6), Southwest Lantau (KP15.6 - 21.3) |
|||
|
IM10 |
803145 |
806407 |
Boundary of Southwest Lantau MP |
|
IM11A |
801914 |
806510 |
Boundary of Southwest Lantau MP |
|
IM12 |
801041 |
807024 |
Boundary of Southwest Lantau MP |
|
IM13 |
800386 |
810750 |
Boundary of Southwest Lantau MP |
|
IM14 |
801376 |
810750 |
Boundary of Southwest Lantau MP |
|
E4 |
801571 |
811923 |
Control Station for Ebb Tide |
|
F4 |
809058 |
806567 |
Control Station for Flood Tide |
|
Group 5 – During construction at the West of Tai O to West of HKIA (KP21.3 - 31.5) |
|||
|
IM15 |
804820 |
821110 |
Boundary of Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau MP |
|
E5 |
804634 |
822606 |
Control Station for Ebb Tide |
|
F5 |
805185 |
816591 |
Control Station for Flood Tide |
|
Group 6 – During construction at the West of HKIA to Lung Kwu Chau (KP31.5 - 37.5) |
|||
|
IM15 |
804820 |
821110 |
Boundary of Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau MP |
|
IM17 |
804865 |
827855 |
Boundary of Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau MP |
|
IM16A |
805039 |
824343 |
Coral Colonies at Pak Chau |
|
E6 |
805418 |
832113 |
Control Station for Ebb Tide |
|
F5 |
805185 |
816591 |
Control Station for Flood Tide |
|
Group 7 – During construction at the Lung Kwu Chau to Urmston Anchorage (37.5 - 41.1), Urmston Road (KP41.1 - 42.9) |
|||
|
IM17 |
804865 |
827855 |
Boundary of Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau MP |
|
IM18 |
806220 |
827890 |
Boundary of Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau MP |
|
IM19 |
807274 |
829250 |
Impact Station for Coastline of Lung Kwu Tan |
|
E6 |
805418 |
832113 |
Control Station for Ebb Tide |
|
F6 |
808812 |
824266 |
Control Station for Flood Tide |
|
E5 |
804634 |
822606 |
Control Station for Flood Tide |
|
Group 8 – During construction at the West of BPPS (KP42.9 - 44.9), Pipeline shore approach at BPPS (KP44.9 - 45.0) |
|||
|
IM19 |
807274 |
829250 |
Impact Station for Coastline of Lung Kwu Tan |
|
IM20A |
809445 |
831728 |
Impact Station for Coastline of Deep Bay |
|
IM21A |
808879 |
830900 |
Coral Colony at Artificial Seawall at BPPS |
|
IM22A |
808703 |
830717 |
Coral Colony at Artificial Seawall at BPPS |
|
E7A |
808313 |
833524 |
Control Station for Ebb Tide |
|
F6 |
808812 |
824266 |
Control Station for Flood Tide |
|
Note: Alternative monitoring stations (E7A, IM11A, IM16A, IM20A, IM21A & IM22A) were proposed by the ET in consultation with the IEC and approved by EPD in accordance with the provision in Section 5.1 and Section 5.2.5 of the Updated EM&A Manual. |
|||
The Action and Limit Levels for marine water quality monitoring have been established based on the baseline marine water quality monitoring data in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual. Action and Limit Levels of key assessment parameters for construction phase marine water quality monitoring including DO, turbidity and SS are summarised in Table 2.6.
Table 2.6 Action and Limit Levels for Marine Water Quality Monitoring
|
Parameter |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|
|
Group 1 – During construction at the pipeline shore approach at LPS (KP17.4 - 18.2), West Lamma Channel (KP14.5 - 17.4) |
|||
|
DO in mg L-1 a |
Surface and Middle 4.2 mg L-1
Bottom 2.4 mg L-1 |
Surface and Middle 2.9 mg L-1
Bottom 1.6 mg L-1 |
|
|
Turbidity in NTU (Depth-averaged b) c |
14.4 NTU, and 120% of the relevant control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day |
19.9 NTU, and 130% of the relevant control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day |
|
|
SS in mg L-1 (Depth-averaged b) c |
20.8 mg L-1, and 120% of the relevant control station's SS at the same tide of the same day |
29.6 mg L-1, and 130% of the relevant control station's SS at the same tide of the same day |
|
|
Group 2 – During construction at the Double Berth Jetty to West Lamma Channel (KP0.0 - 14.5) |
|||
|
DO in mg L-1 a |
Surface and Middle 3.4 mg L-1
Bottom 1.8 mg L-1 |
Surface and Middle 2.4 mg L-1
Bottom 1.4 mg L-1 |
|
|
Turbidity in NTU (Depth-averaged b) c |
17.1 NTU, and 120% of the relevant control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day |
26.8 NTU, and 130% of the relevant control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day |
|
|
SS in mg L-1 (Depth-averaged b) c |
25.7 mg L-1, and 120% of the relevant control station's SS at the same tide of the same day |
37.1 mg L-1, and 130% of the relevant control station's SS at the same tide of the same day |
|
|
Group 3 – During construction at the Jetty Approach (KP0.0 - 5.0), South of Soko Islands (KP5.0 - 8.9), Southwest of Soko Islands (KP8.9 - 12.1) |
|||
|
DO in mg L-1 a |
Surface and Middle 4.1 mg L-1
Bottom 2.7 mg L-1 |
Surface and Middle 3.0 mg L-1
Bottom 2.0 mg L-1 |
|
|
Turbidity in NTU (Depth-averaged b) c |
17.0 NTU, and 120% of the relevant control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day |
30.9 NTU, and 130% of the relevant control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day |
|
|
SS in mg L-1 (Depth-averaged b) c |
22.3 mg L-1, and 120% of the relevant control station's SS at the same tide of the same day |
36.9 mg L-1, and 130% of the relevant control station's SS at the same tide of the same day |
|
|
Group 4 – During construction at the Adamasta Channel (KP12.1 - 15.6), Southwest Lantau (KP15.6 - 21.3) |
|||
|
DO in mg L-1 a |
Surface and Middle 3.4 mg L-1
Bottom 2.8 mg L-1 |
Surface and Middle 2.5 mg L-1
Bottom 2.0 mg L-1 |
|
|
Turbidity in NTU (Depth-averaged b) c |
63.1 NTU, and 120% of the relevant control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day |
165.7 NTU, and 130% of the relevant control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day |
|
|
SS in mg L-1 (Depth-averaged b) c |
75.4 mg L-1, and 120% of the relevant control station's SS at the same tide of the same day |
121.8 mg L-1, and 130% of the relevant control station's SS at the same tide of the same day |
|
|
Group 5 – During construction at the West of Tai O to West of HKIA (KP21.3 - 31.5) |
|||
|
DO in mg L-1 a |
Surface and Middle 4.6 mg L-1
Bottom 4.0 mg L-1 |
Surface and Middle 4.0 mg L-1
Bottom 2.0 mg L-1 |
|
|
Turbidity in NTU (Depth-averaged b) c |
31.9 NTU, and 120% of the relevant control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day |
46.6 NTU, and 130% of the relevant control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day |
|
|
SS in mg L-1 (Depth-averaged b) c |
64.9 mg L-1, and 120% of the relevant control station's SS at the same tide of the same day |
72.5 mg L-1, and 130% of the relevant control station's SS at the same tide of the same day |
|
|
Group 6 – During construction at the West of HKIA to Lung Kwu Chau (KP31.5 - 37.5) |
|||
|
DO in mg L-1 a |
Surface and Middle 4.4 mg L-1
Bottom 3.9 mg L-1 |
Surface and Middle 3.9 mg L-1
Bottom 2.0 mg L-1 |
|
|
Turbidity in NTU (Depth-averaged b) c |
30.7 NTU, and 120% of the relevant control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day |
47.0 NTU, and 130% of the relevant control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day |
|
|
SS in mg L-1 (Depth-averaged b) c |
49.2 mg L-1, and 120% of the relevant control station's SS at the same tide of the same day |
74.0 mg L-1, and 130% of the relevant control station's SS at the same tide of the same day |
|
|
Group 7 – During construction at the Lung Kwu Chau to Urmston Anchorage (37.5 - 41.1), Urmston Road (KP41.1 - 42.9) |
|||
|
DO in mg L-1 a |
Surface and Middle 3.8 mg L-1
Bottom 3.1 mg L-1 |
Surface and Middle 3.4 mg L-1
Bottom 2.0 mg L-1 |
|
|
Turbidity in NTU (Depth-averaged b) c |
34.5 NTU, and 120% of the relevant control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day |
79.2 NTU, and 130% of the relevant control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day |
|
|
SS in mg L-1 (Depth-averaged b) c |
37.8 mg L-1, and 120% of the relevant control station's SS at the same tide of the same day |
98.2 mg L-1, and 130% of the relevant control station's SS at the same tide of the same day |
|
|
Group 8 – During construction at the West of BPPS (KP42.9 - 44.9), Pipeline shore approach at BPPS (KP44.9 - 45.0) |
|||
|
DO in mg L-1 a |
Surface and Middle 4.3 mg L-1
Bottom 3.6 mg L-1 |
Surface and Middle 3.4 mg L-1
Bottom 2.0 mg L-1 |
|
|
Turbidity in NTU (Depth-averaged b) c |
34.3 NTU, and 120% of the relevant control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day |
58.5 NTU, and 130% of the relevant control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day |
|
|
SS in mg L-1 (Depth-averaged b) c |
42.4 mg L-1, and 120% of the relevant control station's SS at the same tide of the same day |
78.2 mg L-1, and 130% of the relevant control station's SS at the same tide of the same day |
|
|
Notes: a. For DO, non-compliance of the water quality limits occurs when monitoring result is lower than the limits. b. “Depth-averaged” is calculated by taking the arithmetic means of reading of all three depths. c. For Turbidity and SS, non-compliance of the water quality limits occurs when monitoring result is higher than the limits. |
|||
The Event and Action Plan for marine water quality monitoring can be referred to the Updated EM&A Manual.
A total of 33 monitoring events for construction phase marine water quality monitoring were conducted for construction of BPPS Pipeline and LPS Pipeline within the works area(s) for the associated marine-based activities in the reporting period. Graphical presentations are provided in Annex F. There were no Project-related Action and Limit Level exceedances for marine water quality monitoring in the reporting period.
In accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual, vessel-based marine mammal survey by means of systematic line-transect boat survey was undertaken to examine the distribution and encounter rate of Finless Porpoise (FP) in southern Lantau where a majority of Project construction works would take place. Survey transects covered three survey areas for line-transect boat surveys, namely Southwest Lantau (SWL), Southeast Lantau (SEL) and Lamma (LM) are presented in Figure 2.2. The methodology of the survey is consistent and compatible with that adopted in the EIA baseline surveys as well as the long-term marine mammal monitoring programme conducted by AFCD since 1995 to allow potential comparisons and pooling data for analysis. Vessel-based line transect marine mammal surveys are conducted during construction of the LNG Terminal. Each transect line is surveyed twice per month. The detailed methodology is presented in the Updated EM&A Manual.
In accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual, underwater PAM survey using C-POD (Cetacean-Porpoise Detector) was conducted at five locations as presented in Figure 2.3. C-PODs are left in place during construction of the LNG Terminal. Such duration should allow for a robust record of marine mammal usage of the area to be obtained and allow for the inter-seasonal differences already known for finless porpoises. The C-PODs have to be serviced every two to four months, subject to review on an as-needed basis, to download accumulated data and replace batteries.
The Action and Limit Levels for marine mammal monitoring are established using encounter rate calculated from the six-month baseline vessel-based line transect surveys from the three survey areas as a whole in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual. The combined baseline encounter rate will be used to compare with the encounter rate obtained during construction phase monitoring calculated from last three month’s monitoring data (i.e. running quarterly value). This approach would allow natural seasonal fluctuations in FP encounter rate to be accounted for, and allow data to be reviewed every month such as appropriate remedial actions could be taken timely if the threshold values are triggered. The Action and Limit Levels are provided in Table 2.7.
Table 2.7 Action and Limit Levels for Marine Mammal Monitoring
|
Monitoring Area |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|
SWL, SEL and LM as a whole |
Running quarterly STG < 1.12 & ANI < 2.18 |
Two consecutive running quarterly STG < 1.12 & ANI < 2.18 |
|
Notes: STG = Encounter Rate of Number of Porpoise Sightings ANI = Encounter Rate of Number of Porpoises Action / Limit Levels will be triggered if both STG and ANI fall below the criteria. |
||
The Event and Action Plan for marine mammal monitoring can be referred to relevant Annexes of the associated Monthly EM&A Reports for the reporting period.
A total of 12 vessel-based line transect surveys were conducted in October and November 2021 when jacket installation works of the Project were undertaken. The FPs sighted in the three survey areas, SWL, SEL and LM, in the reporting period are presented in Figure 2.4.
The running quarterly STG and ANI for the combined survey areas from SWL, SEL and LM during the reporting period and the previous months during the period of piling works are summarised in Table 2.8.
Table 2.8 Running Quarterly STG and ANI for Finless Porpoise
|
Survey Period |
On-effort (km) |
No. of Sighting |
No. of Porpoise |
STG |
ANI |
Running STG |
Running ANI |
|
Dec 2020 |
219.30 |
3 |
7 |
1.36 |
3.18 |
- |
- |
|
Jul 2021 |
375.86 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
- |
- |
|
Aug 2021 |
379.00 |
2 |
10 |
0.53 |
2.64 |
- |
- |
|
Sep 2021 |
331.64 |
7 |
22 |
2.11 |
6.63 |
0.83 |
2.95 |
|
Oct 2021 |
95.79 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.12 |
3.97 |
|
Nov 2021 |
208.05 |
10 |
30 |
4.81 |
14.42 |
2.68 |
8.18 |
|
Notes: Only data collected at Beaufort Sea State 2 or below were included for encounter rate analysis. Running STG and Running ANI were calculated by combining three consecutive survey months data (i.e. combining the data with the previous two months). Marine mammal monitoring between January and June 2021 was not conducted as no piling works for construction of the jetty were carried out between January and June 2021 in accordance with Condition 3.3 of the FEP. |
|||||||
The running quarterly values of encounter rate in terms of STG and ANI were 2.68 and 8.18, respectively. Therefore, there were no breaches of Action and Limit Levels for marine mammal monitoring in the reporting period.
Five C-POD units have been deployed at the five locations since the commencement of construction for FEP-01/558/2018/A on 27 November 2020. These units will be serviced every two to four months, subject to review on an as-needed basis, to download accumulated data and replace batteries. The latest round of C-POD servicing was conducted in early November 2021. Following the completion of jacket installation works (i.e. piling works) of the Project in November 2021, the PAM data for the marine mammal monitoring during construction phase will be retrieved for further analysis of the activity of FP during both day and night. The results will be reported in the quarterly EM&A summary report for the next reporting period (i.e. Jan-Mar 2022) once the PAM data are retrieved.
The jacket installation works (i.e. piling works) of the Project were completed on 10 November 2021. Throughout the period of jacket installation works in December 2020 and July to November 2021, the results of the vessel-based line transect marine mammal surveys indicated that there were no breaches of Action and Limit Levels for marine mammal monitoring, indicating that there were no unacceptable/ unforeseen changes in FP distribution as a result of jacket installation works. It should be noted that with implementation of the recommended mitigation measures during construction phase of the Project, no unacceptable impacts on FPs were anticipated as documented in the approved EIA Report. The recommended mitigation measures have been implemented/ adopted during the course of piling works, including the use of structural jacket and bubble curtain to enclose the pile installation work, acoustic decoupling of noisy equipment on work barges, piling with ramp-up procedures; use of hydraulic hammering with noise reduction system; avoidance of underwater percussive piling at night time and during the peak occurrence season of FP; and monitoring of marine mammal exclusion zone with a radius of 500m. The review on the encounter rates of FP (i.e. running STG and ANI) ranged from 0.83 to 2.68 (for running STG) and 2.95 to 8.18 (for running ANI), at which no Action / Limit Level exceedances in marine mammal monitoring were triggered during the piling works. Therefore, variation between the EIA study predictions and the EM&A monitoring results was not found.
As the marine mammal monitoring is recommended to determine the efficacy of the recommended mitigation measures and provide verification of impact prediction/ evaluation results which is specific to the impact from underwater sound from Jetty pile installation works, the marine mammal monitoring for construction phase is considered completed in November 2021 following the completion of jacket installation works (i.e. piling works) of the Project. No further construction phase marine mammal monitoring (both vessel-based line transect marine mammal surveys and passive acoustic monitoring) is necessary to be conducted for the remaining works (i.e. topside construction) under the EM&A programme as consulted with EPD and AFCD in late November 2021.
One year post-construction marine mammal monitoring will be conducted following the start of operation of the LNG Terminal to investigate if there are any unacceptable/ unforeseen changes in FP distribution due to the Project construction. The findings of the monitoring, which will be compared with the data obtained during baseline (Jun - Nov 2019 for vessel-based line transect marine mammal surveys and Oct 2019 - March 2020 for passive acoustic monitoring) and construction phase monitoring (Dec 2020 and Jul – Nov 2021 for both vessel-based line transect marine mammal surveys and passive acoustic monitoring), will be reported in accordance with Section 12.4 of the Updated EM&A Manual.
According to Condition 3.7 of FEP-01/558/2018/A, Condition 3.7 of FEP-02/558/2018/A, Condition 3.8 of FEP-03/558/2018/B, Section 9.11.3 of the approved EIA Report and Section 7 of the Updated EM&A Manual, marine mammal exclusion zone monitoring is required during dredging / jetting operations for construction of BPPS Pipeline or LPS Pipeline and during percussive piling works for construction of the Jetty. Marine mammal exclusion zone requirements are presented in Table 2.9.
Table 2.9 Marine Mammal Exclusion Zone Requirements
|
Activity |
Exclusion Zone |
Requirement |
|
Marine dredging or jetting operations for construction of BPPS Pipeline or LPS Pipeline |
250m |
Before pipeline dredging or jetting commence, the exclusion zone must have been continuously clear of marine mammals for 30 minutes. During pipeline dredging/ jetting, if marine mammals are spotted within the exclusion zone, pipeline dredging/ jetting works will cease and will not resume until the observer confirms that the zone has been continuously clear of marine mammals for a period of 30 minutes. |
|
Percussive piling works for construction of the Jetty |
500m |
Before percussive piling commences, the exclusion zone must have been continuously clear of marine mammals for 30 minutes. During percussive piling, if marine mammals are spotted within the exclusion zone, percussive piling works will cease and will not resume until the observer confirms that the zone has been continuously clear of marine mammals for a period of 30 minutes. |
Marine mammal exclusion zone monitoring was conducted during the reporting period when marine jetting operation for construction of BPPS / LPS Pipeline and percussive piling works for construction of the Jetty were undertaken. No sightings of marine mammals were observed during marine mammal exclusion zone monitoring in the reporting period. The monitoring results for marine mammal exclusion zone monitoring in the reporting period is summarised in Table 2.10.
Table 2.10 Monitoring Results for Marine Mammal Exclusion Zone Monitoring
|
Date |
Active works activities |
Monitoring results |
|
2, 4-7, 15, 19-23, 27-30 Oct 2021 |
Percussive piling works for construction of the Jetty |
No sightings of marine mammals |
|
1-6, 8 Nov 2021 |
||
|
1-2 Oct 2021 |
Marine jetting operation at South of Shek Kwu Chau to West Lamma Channel for LPS Pipeline |
|
|
5-6 Nov 2021 |
||
|
3-8, 24-25 Dec 2021 |
||
|
1-4, 18-31 Oct 2021 |
Marine jetting operation at West of Tai O to West of HKIA for BPPS Pipeline |
|
|
1, 4-7, 10-16 Nov 2021 |
||
|
3-8, 10-12, 17-19, 21-22 Dec 2021 |
||
|
20, 24-28 Nov 2021 |
Marine jetting operation at Adamasta Channel for BPPS Pipeline |
|
|
23-31 Dec 2021 |
||
|
3-7, 10-16 Dec 2021 |
Marine jetting operation at Southwest of Soko Islands for BPPS Pipeline |
|
|
23-31 Dec 2021 |
Marine jetting operation at Southwest Lantau for BPPS Pipeline |
|
|
24-31 Dec 2021 |
Marine jetting operation at West of HKIA to Lung Kwu Chau for BPPS Pipeline |
The operating speeds and marine travel routes of working vessels for construction of the Project within the reporting period were checked and reviewed. A total of 28 working vessels were used for the construction of the Jetty, LPS Pipeline and BPPS Pipeline under FEP-01/558/2018/A, FEP-02/558/2018/A and FEP-03/558/2018/B, respectively, during the reporting period. All these working vessels were operated at a speed lower than 10 knots when moving within the areas frequented by marine mammals, including the waters near Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau Marine Park, the waters at the west of Lantau Island and the waters between Soko Islands and Shek Kwu Chau, and followed the relevant marine travel requirements stipulated in the FEP except a working vessel (Zhong You Hai 281) which was operated at a speed higher than 10 knots within the area frequented by marine mammals south to Southwest Lantau Marine Park on 30 October 2021. However, this incident was caused by current influence upon investigation. No non-compliance on the operating speeds and marine travel routes of working vessels was identified. Records of operating speeds and marine travel routes of working vessels for construction of the Project provided by the Contractor can be referred to the relevant Annexes of the associated Monthly EM&A Reports for the reporting period.
The compliance status on approval conditions given by the Director of Environmental Protection for the entry of working vessels (i.e. anchor handling tugs (AHTs)) within marine parks and the proposed SLMP in pursuant to Condition 3.1 of FEP-01/558/2018/A for anchoring activities for piling operation and jacket installation for construction of the Jetty, Condition 3.4 of FEP-02/558/2018/A and Condition 3.4 of FEP-03/558/2018/B for anchoring activities for pipelaying and/or post-trenching processes for construction of LPS and BPPS Pipelines, respectively, as appropriate within the reporting period was checked. A total of nine AHTs with 31 entries to the marine parks and the proposed SLMP were recorded within the reporting period. No non-compliance on the approval conditions was identified. Records of entry events of working vessels within the marine parks and the proposed SLMP provided by the Contractor can be referred to relevant Annexes of the associated Monthly EM&A Reports for the reporting period.
A summary of the Environmental Mitigation Implementation Schedule (EMIS) is presented in Annex C. The necessary mitigation measures were implemented properly for the Project.
There were no Project-related Action and Limit Level exceedances for marine water quality monitoring in the reporting period.
There were no breaches of Action and Limit Levels for marine mammal monitoring in the reporting period.
Cumulative statistics on exceedance is provided in Annex E.
There were no environmental complaints, notification of summons and successful prosecutions recorded in the reporting period.
Statistics on environmental complaints, notification of summons and successful prosecutions are summarised in Annex E.
This Quarterly EM&A Summary Report presents the key findings of the EM&A works during the reporting period from 1 October to 31 December 2021 for the construction works for the Project in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual and the requirements of the Further Environmental Permits (FEP-01/558/2018/A, FEP-02/558/2018/A & FEP-03/558/2018/B).
Environmental auditing works, including regular site inspections of construction works conducted by the ET, audit of implementation of Waste Management Plan, and review of the acceptability of operating speeds and marine travel routes of working vessels, including checking of compliance with the approval conditions given by EPD for allowing the entry of working vessels within marine parks and the proposed SLMP in pursuant to Condition 3.1 of FEP-01/558/2018/A, Condition 3.4 of FEP-02/558/2018/A and Condition 3.4 of FEP-03/558/2018/B, were conducted in the reporting period, as appropriate. No non-compliance of environmental statutory requirements was identified.
Marine water quality monitoring was conducted during the reporting period in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual. No Project-related Action and Limit Level exceedances were recorded.
Construction phase marine mammal monitoring (vessel-based line transect survey and passive acoustic monitoring) was conducted during the reporting period in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual, and was completed following the completion of piling works in November 2021. No breaches of Action and Limit Levels were recorded.
There were no environmental complaints, notification of summons and successful prosecutions recorded in the reporting period.
The recommended
environmental mitigation measures for the Project were effectively implemented
and the EM&A programme undertaken by the ET has effectively monitored the
construction activities as well as ensured proper implementation of mitigation
measures in the reporting period.
([1]) Application for variation of an environmental permit for FEP-01/558/2018 was undertaken and the latest FEP (FEP-01/558/2018/A) was issued on 6 November 2020.